For my part, my name is Jeramy Ware, and I'm running for a judge again this year. I've served this year and once before in 2007. If anyone is interested in seeing the way I judge and the kinds of products I vote for you can check out my blog at
http://enniesjudge.blogspot.com It does a better job of describing my judging style and the sorts of things I look for in a product far better than I could here.
Most importantly I believe that the judging process should:
*Be open and honest.
*Serve the needs of the community and the publishers and fans that support it.
*Judge each product on its own merits, rather than against one another.
*Take into consideration the thoughts and preferences of others.
*Be receptive to questions and critisism.
*Be responsive to those who take their time to offer input.
I hope that in my terms I have met those goals, and I promise to continue to strive toward those ends should I be elected again.
If you find yourselves so inclined I'd appreciate it if you could take a few moments and vote on the perspective judges at
http://www.ennie-awards.com/voting/jvoting.asp A lower number is a better vote, and voting for more than one person is a good way to ensure that your vote still counts, even if your first choice doesn't make it.
Thanks for your time, and any support you can offer.