Timba wrote:The traditional xia of fiction is a non-conformist who fights for justice. He is honorable to a fault, his word is inviolable, and his reputation is more important than life itself. This type of xia is the idealized version of the heroic xia, and is primarily encountered in modern fiction and cinema.
A less romanticized description of xia can be drawn from history and more traditional fiction. This xia is also a swordsman, but one who is more dogmatic than altruistic. He is a champion for any cause to which he has pledged his loyalty, be it benevolent or otherwise. This definition takes into account the sometimes dubious nature of actions performed by xia. Along these lines, in Once Upon a Time in China all swordsmen who adhere to the principles of loyalty, reciprocity, and duty are xia. No distinction is made between xia who are altruistic, and those whose motives are of questionable merit.
Using this example as a base (and forgetting the Wu part of the equation momentarily), the best western version of the Xia I can think of is the old Western Gunslinger. Sure, he doesn't fly or use martial arts (which may be what is tripping up some people's comparisons), but in attitude he seems the closest fit. In fact, in the few Wuxia films I've seen (CTHD, Dragon Inn, a few others the name of which escapes me at the moment) some of the story elements used match those used in the old Westerns far more closely than those in newer movies like The Matrix.
Just my two bits in the "What is Wuxia" debate.