Moderator: Super Moderators




Zorbeltuss wrote:Plus, the reach had a mostly intact army, so they had good cards on their hands. Add their strength to whatever was left of Dornish/loyalist forces and they might decide to marry Arianne to Viserys and one of Mace's kids to Dany.



Mat wrote: If you look some posts back you can find the House Sheet of House Hightower. It lacks names and specific things but i think it is usable.

Iron Legs wrote:5- Oldtown and his Maesters, intriguing over science and power in the Citadel.


Mat wrote:Be free to post here you ideas of adventure and we try to help you for what we can!


crowofpyke wrote:There isn't a ton of description about the region in the books, at least not compared to the others. But we can glean some knowledge and extrapolate possibilities. We know that the Knight of Flowers is from the Reach, as are the Tyrells. Well, they all have lots of money, not like the Lannisters but pretty damned close from what I recall in the books. They value fancy dress and intrigue a lot. They know and like all manner of different foods, including excellent wines. The lands are described as very fertile.
My history degree in medieval social-economics tells me that if you live in a region like that life is not only good, but that everything about it is remarkably better than anywhere else... assuming that there is a central power strong enough and feared enough to maintain control. If there is not a central power, such as House Tyrell, the region would quickly degenerate into a massive number of tiny wars and squabbling - all due to greed over the amount of resources up for grabs. Think on that for a moment: House Tyrell is so powerful and so *feared* that they can maintain control over such a vast, wealthy region. Wow. If your campaign is set in the Reach: Do.Not.Mess.With.House.Tyrell. What else does such a rich region tell us? The rate of infant mortality is likely MUCH lower here than in other regions. There is less fear about children dying before the age of 10. The peasants are well fed. A wine maker, an inn keeper, or even a wool maker may be more wealthy than some minor lords from the region, and definitely so compared to such lords from other less wealthy regions. The availability of "medical care" is likely better in this region than in others, due to the proximity to Old Town and to the richness of the region. And the arts... the arts in such a region likely flourish, if under a strong central power as noted above. For an example of the *luxury of time* people have in this region look no further than the armor of the Knight of Flowers. This is due to the specialization of economic roles that comes with increased population and the movement of peasants to towns and cities. When you get specialization of economic roles (such as a silversmith), you get more time for things like the arts. Population also effects House Tyrell - they can draw such a vast army not only because of their wealth, but because the Reach is so populous.
When I picture the Reach in my mind's eye I see not only the green fields and hills and huge vineyards, but houses like those build in the Alsace-Lorane region between France and Germany: White, with the brown cross-beams... well insulated, well maintained, well made. And I see a people who are in remarkably good health and shape compared to other regions. But... all that goes to crap in a hand basket with out a strong central power striking fear into those who might pick a fight over some coveted resource or another....
Hope this helps.




Gurkhal wrote:3. The memory of House Garnder is probably still very strong and I wouldn't be suprised that it has strong roots in a hagiographic (I hope I used this word right) veneratin for the old Gardeners among the smallfolk, and perhaps among some of the nobles as well. The Tyrells probably see this with very mixed feelings.
I find it really strange that only the Florents wants to replace the Tyrells of all the powerful Houses with alot of tradition behind them in the Reach.
Very rich and populous although I would think that the nobles' grip on the smallfolk is the strongest here than perhaps in any other place in Westeros.
If therer is any system of serfs in Westeros its probably in the Reach.

4. The Tyrells are mostly viewed as upstarts and pretenders by alot of House, certainly by more than only the Florent who might think they have a better claim to be Lords Paramount although few of them are willing to attract the wrath of the Iron Throne. As I see it the Florents are the loudest bannermen who want Highgarden for themselves but not the only ones. I find it really strange that only the Florents wants to replace the Tyrells of all the powerful Houses with alot of tradition behind them in the Reach.
1. They are not the closest descendants to house. In fact I'd say it's Tyrells allies: The Redwyne and Tarlys which make them powerful. Would they lose their support, houses like House Florent would be more openly in their actions against them.
On a side note regarding the luxurious armour of loras, I always thought it to be sponsored by Renly.
It was a great read, I agree and I can only agree regarding the general historical observations but - there's always a but - I don't see the Tyrells power as very strong. Their claim to the wardenship is not the best:

DaimosofRedstone wrote:Gurkhal wrote:3. The memory of House Garnder is probably still very strong and I wouldn't be suprised that it has strong roots in a hagiographic (I hope I used this word right) veneratin for the old Gardeners among the smallfolk, and perhaps among some of the nobles as well. The Tyrells probably see this with very mixed feelings.
Do you really mean 'hagiographic' as in 'venerating them as saints, holy men, etc.'?
I am not quite sure how that would square with Westerosi religious culture since even Blessed Baelor seems to be more 'good man' than holy man.
DaimosofRedstone wrote:Gurkhal wrote:I find it really strange that only the Florents wants to replace the Tyrells of all the powerful Houses with alot of tradition behind them in the Reach.
Well you do not make trouble just for the hell of it. Peace is preferable for anybody with an interest in trade... or tax... or any economic venture really.
If the Tyrells do not **** it up and make sure every body has a place at the table few will want to topple them.
DaimosofRedstone wrote:Gurkhal wrote:If therer is any system of serfs in Westeros its probably in the Reach.
Feudal system does not work without serfdom so you will find something like that in every kingdom.
devilsgrin wrote:4. The Tyrells are mostly viewed as upstarts and pretenders by alot of House, certainly by more than only the Florent who might think they have a better claim to be Lords Paramount although few of them are willing to attract the wrath of the Iron Throne. As I see it the Florents are the loudest bannermen who want Highgarden for themselves but not the only ones. I find it really strange that only the Florents wants to replace the Tyrells of all the powerful Houses with alot of tradition behind them in the Reach.
I don't see this supported anywhere in the novels at all. Aside from House Florent, the majority of the Reach are loyal bannermen to the Tyrell's.
Moreover, the Florent's might have wanted the throne of Highgarden, but the important factor here, is that House Tyrell is vastly more powerful than any of the other houses in the Reach.

Gurkhal wrote: Although in my defense, which isn't nearly right on but somewhat close, there are mentioiongs in Dance of Dragons that the Reach might not prove to be as faithful to Highgarden as Mace thinks.

Could you cite this? I don't remember anything like that.
Laswell Peake rapped his knuckles on the table. "Even after a century, some of us still have friends in the Reach. The power of Highgarden may not be what Mace Tyrell imagines."

Gurkhal wrote:5. Very rich and populous although I would think that the nobles' grip on the smallfolk is the strongest here than perhaps in any other place in Westeros. If therer is any system of serfs in Westeros its probably in the Reach.


crowofpyke wrote:Gurkhal wrote:5. Very rich and populous although I would think that the nobles' grip on the smallfolk is the strongest here than perhaps in any other place in Westeros. If therer is any system of serfs in Westeros its probably in the Reach.
The exact opposite is true. Two things effect peasant movement and the strict application of any kind of "serf code". 1- How poor a region is or any widespread disaster, and 2- how rich a region is overall.
1-If a region is very poor or has had some widespread disaster, lords will actually go and STEAL the peasants from their neighbors AND protect said peasants from retaliation. Why? If you are a lord, you want your lands worked, period. That can't be done very well without the peasants to work them. History is well stocked of examples of lords working their own fields because they have lost all their peasants - work your own fields or starve.
2-If a region is rich it raises the possibility of economic specialization, as I noted above. Economic specialization is when you have more peasants than you need to work the fields - your population is large enough already. This means peasants can move away to towns and cities and be a silversmith, or baker, cobbler, etc. Overall this means more movement to towns and cities and the creation of a free merchant class. This is The Reach.
It is when a region is neither too poor or too rich that the "sweet spot" of peasant servitude is found. It is not so poor that other lords are tempted to steal your peasants, nor is it too rich to promote economic specialization and the movement of peasants away from your lands to get other opportunities.
As for House Tyrell:
No one cares where they came from or how "upjumped" they are... they have control now. That may be through the careful use of alliances with other major houses, and that's fine. Who leads? Tyrell. Which means either they have the means or the goods with which to do so, including putting fear into their possible enemies... and likely fear into their allies as well. If Tyrell goes down, the whole region will destablize... at least that is what would occur based on historical data of "the real world".
Again, hope this helps.

Gurkhal wrote:3. I don't know. I'm of the opinion that the rule over the serfs were much harder than that.
4. As for Tyrell that don't really make much sense to me. We can see in the Riverlands that the Riverlords will turn on the Freys at moment's notice despite the fact that the Freys are in control and people seems to care alot of how they got there. I would think that the Tyrells are only lords due to centuries of machinations and two major wars against dissident lords, the Dance of Dragons and the Blackfyre Rebellions, and only in recent memory can the House of the Rose start to feel secure.

Return to A Song of Ice and Fire RPG
Users browsing this forum: nmastalerz and 2 guests